PDA

View Full Version : Interesting Account of Malayan Campaign


TK421
11-05-2006, 07:52 PM
I recently came across a little book entitled "A Brief Study of the Malayan Campaign 1941-42" by a Capt S.G. Chaphekar. The author fought in the campaign and was taken prisoner. The book isn't perfect, but it has some interesting analysis of Japanese equipment and tactics.

On the topic of small arms, he stated that the Japanese rifle had greater range but less "hitting power." He also mentioned that they made good use of light "Tommy-guns." Perhaps he was referring to light machineguns (like the Taisho 11 or Type 96), but by his statements about British kit deficiencies he seems to know the difference between machineguns and sub-machineguns. I have found one other reference to a Japanese SMG (the 1941 Model 100). Anyone have any insights or information to offer on this?

He states that their second favourite weapon was the light mortar, which A&AM does very nicely. The third weapon of choice was the hand grenade.
He also mentions the successful effects of Japanese tanks.

Perhaps there is room for a Japanese MG with suppressive fire? In any case, A&AM seems to reflect fairly well the Japanese army that this Captain faced in battle (mine favours machineguns and mortars). Once my e-bay Japanese tanks arrive my Malayan invasion force will be complete.

Something that could possibly be represented in scenarios was his obsevation that the Japanese force employed infiltration and outflanking manouevres combined with de-centralized command and control. I'm trying to cook up some scenarios based on the accounts in this little book. I need some Jungle maps!

Cheers,

TK

Predator666
11-05-2006, 08:12 PM
He was probably refering to the type 100. It was produced late in the war for the Japanese and could have drastically helped during the island campaigns in the jungle. I know wiki ain't the best source but here it is...It says that only around 30,000 were made I believe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_100_submachine_gun

I tried to look for it on a weapons site I know of but they didn't have it.

TK421
11-05-2006, 08:36 PM
I'm guessing the Type 100 as well. I'm going to go digging at the library tommorow. The actions he was referring to happened in early 1942. I have an old book on infantry weapons for WWII that has a date of 1941 for the first Type 100s, with an improved version produced in 1944. I wonder if they get little mention in the many defensive stands of the mid to late war when the emphasis would have been on machineguns defending from bunkers instead of infantry maneouvring in the jungle?

It could have been the various squad automatics that were used (one was similar to the Bren). Yet more pieces we need. Give me the 75mm infantry gun first!

Cheers and thanks,

TK

Andras
11-06-2006, 05:57 AM
Japanese Type 100 of 1941, app 10,000 were built. It was revised in 1944.

http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/4825/2by0.jpg

Anubis
11-06-2006, 08:08 AM
Jez do you own that? That things a beast, can spew alot of lead.

If your going to make a malaya force, don't forget to include the Tiger of Mayala.

TheCygnysGuardian
11-06-2006, 08:11 AM
It kind of looks like a Bren. It is a good looking gun, I must say.

Autarch
11-06-2006, 06:33 PM
He also mentions the successful effects of Japanese tanks.



What exactly did he say about the Japanese tanks?

Predator666
11-06-2006, 07:30 PM
It looks like it could be hard to reload. Just because of the distance to the clip. People with shorter arms would have trouble reaching it easily if they don't wan't to move much.

If the Japanese would have used one of these more and more carbine versions of the Arisaka then they might have had an upper had during island battles.