Looking for opponent for AArevised

[anton1983]

Want a game?
1. AARE by original or LHTR?
2. I use motc mapwiew. I have played 20 games of AARE via email!
3. My email address is anton.bartol@zg.t-com.hr !
4. I like to play with axis more, but I have no problem with allies either!

Contact me if you want to play

[pagan]

what happened in the AAMC tourney?

you did 1 turn and then ran away or conceeded defeat, causing AH a loss ....?

I hope you don't include that game in your string of 20 !
.

[anton1983]

No I didnt include that in my wins! I withdraw from that game because I couldnt stand playing on fida or flames of europe map! I only know how to play on motc map! When I enterted that tourney I was hoping that I would get an opponent who was willing to play on motc map, but I didnt and i withdraw! What can I say, bad luck! I have lost a capple of games but I have ritten that I have won more than 20 because I dont want to play against some rookie! You intetrested to take on me?

[pagan]

you could have gotten someone to take over your game for you.

I got someone to take my spot. Otherwise i would have had to play the game with AAbattlemap

What you did is GIVE the AAMC guys a free win.

That was a competition, not a personal friendly game. It was an AH team thing.

The fact that you quit means I will never play a game with you, and i would advise anyone against doing so as well
.

[anton1983]

I am sorry Pagan! I was a rookie then on AAMC tourney and that way my first tournament! I didnt know that I could be replaced and I didnt know that that tournament was so important! I would like to apologise to everybody I hurt with me living that tournament and especially to you pagan since you have teached me so much so far! But you know what they say about students and teachers? The student always becomes better! And there is only one way to find out if that is true and you know how!

[Stephen]

The fact that you quit means I will never play a game with you, and i would advise anyone against doing so as well.
How ironic...

[anton1983]

Hey stephen maybe you want to play?

[axis_roll]

How ironic...
I thought the same thing Stephen

[anton1983]

Thanks for backup guys!

[pagan]

STEPHEN & AXIS_ROLL>>>
You should read and try to comprehend the sentence structures in a combined fashion rather than selective excerpts

If you do this, and should either of you find irony again, then be sure to label yourselves as idiots
.

[axis_roll]

STEPHEN & AXIS_ROLL>>>
You should read and try to comprehend the sentence structures in a combined fashion rather than selective excerpts

If you do this, and should either of you find irony again, then be sure to label yourselves as idiots
.
I knew this would go right over your hypocritical head Pagan.

You were deriding Anton for quiting his game.
Look at your own actions in your game against Psychotropic:
The game has been called on account of irreconcilable differences. Pagan sent his final map ( after dice rolls and unit placement), then decided he didn't like the look of it and changed his combats (ie forget that I attacked your tranny, you can have it back I would rather have those ftr's in Berlin. I think he also wanted to change his combat for West Europe as well - again after all Battles had already been fought. I said I don't think you can do that but if you want to change some of your non-combat moves go ahead. He said I was not being fair and quit. :(

NOW do you see the irony?

who is the idiot here?

[Stephen]

Essentially, what Axis_roll said. :D Forgot the incident CJ mentioned in that same thread...

[Stephen]

Hey stephen maybe you want to play?
Sure thing. We can PM to get the details together...

[pagan]

axis_roll -->

you have failed to comprehend my writing, so you are out of context

i am too smart for anyone to deal with, or perhaps people are too dumb for me to deal with. This is merely a possibility. The inverse of this is improbable.

But then again, what is intelligence really but an insubstantial concept of a brain's capacity to process concepts... the explanation in the definition makes it unintelligable

what i wrote is not duplicitous, nor are my actions anything other than linear & rational

i will not make another public statment with regards to this matter
.

[Stephen]

axis_roll -->

you have failed to comprehend my writing, so you are out of context

i am too smart for anyone to deal with, or perhaps people are too dumb for me to deal with. This is merely a possibility. The inverse of this is improbable.

But then again, what is intelligence really but an insubstantial concept of a brain's capacity to process concepts... the explanation in the definition makes it unintelligable

what i wrote is not duplicitous, nor are my actions anything other than linear & rational

i will not make another public statment with regards to this matter
.
Pagan, Pagan, you are not too smart for anyone to deal with. Nor are we too dumb for you. Of course, I can't prove this anymore than you can prove your statement true. The fact that you right abstractly, explicitly stating one thing while implicitly stating another (in an environment like this), may reflect some degree of intelligence but displays a significant lack of other skills.

This is a game. We play this game to have fun. Play whom you wish, advise what you wish and quit when you wish. But do us all a favour and try to understand that many of our fellow board-members are quite capable of holding their own against you in a variety of life's challenges, tests and games (with the possible exception of Hare's).

Given your pledge not to offer any further public statements on this topic, I would also request that you refrain from making and further private statements on this topic. With that said, unless someone else wishes to respond to Pagan's comments, let all who wish to play A&A play all who would take them on! :rolleyes:

[DocD]

You guys show is funny.

Pagan, I'm surprised you would come down so hard on Anton. True he should have not quit the tournament like that, but he had a good reason.

Your reason for quiting your game with tropic is quizzical at best.

Let's all cool it and move on. Now who wants to hear about this butt kicking I'm giving CJ?? :)

[axis_roll]

They tell us their right because they're so smart, we just can not comprehend that they could be (and indeed, in this case) ARE wrong.

You know, we're all human and we ALL make mistakes. No one here is infallible, even the Mega-brained PAGAN.

Life goes on....

[Stephen]

AR, the way I look at things, there are people who are truly beyond the rest of us, but nothing has happened on these boards or in anything related to A&A to make me think that anyone I interact with here is leaps and bounds beyond anyone else. Intelligence itself being a controversial topic (what is intelligence and how do you define it?), what does it mean that someone is capable of understanding something I don't know... is the world's finest Chemist automatically more intelligent than me? Who's to say? Certainly noone here.

My advice to everyone else here: Believe noone who believes themselves to be more intelligent than you. They can't prove themselves right, and debating "I'm smarter than you are" is more suited to the playground than these boards.

[psychotropic]

I believe some light can be shed on this by a simple google search of the term narcissistic -

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beggining by early adulthood and present in a vaiety of contexts, as indicated by five or more of the following:

1. has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements) :rolleyes:

2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

3. believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
requires excessive admiration :rolleyes:

4. has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations

5. is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends

6. lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others :rolleyes:

7. is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her

8. shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes :rolleyes:

[DocD]

WoW....that sounds like a relative of mine.