PDA

View Full Version : Updating the official scenarios?


Jaels
01-31-2006, 12:19 PM
Once the third set is out, I think it would be a nice thing to update the scenarios provided by WotC with the new units available. Africa scenarios with Valentines, Mathildas (?), Australian troops, Panzer IIIs and the like.

Maybe as an alternative unit pool for each scenario?

Stojakovic
01-31-2006, 12:52 PM
Yeah that somewhat a good Idea. Rather then changing the whole thing give a list of what units you can sub. for other units. Under a chart or something. It would be nice to see a Stuka in some Afrika Scenarios.

elindo
01-31-2006, 01:47 PM
I doubt they would do that will update the current ones. However, every scenario thus far has a army point cost if you want to custom build an army. I assume you'd want to stick to the year and nation restrictions with logical exceptions(lend lease shermans, etc.)

Stojakovic
01-31-2006, 02:56 PM
I doubt they would do that will update the current ones. However, every scenario thus far has a army point cost if you want to custom build an army. I assume you'd want to stick to the year and nation restrictions with logical exceptions(lend lease shermans, etc.)

that works too...

WotC Bob
02-01-2006, 10:04 AM
Rather than go through and update each individual scenario sheet what we will most likely do is one large document that provides new army builds for each scenario in text format. Easier to update and maintain from release to release.

Pasalades
02-01-2006, 10:07 AM
That's a great idea. It would still be a lot of trouble to keep it up to date with each set release though.

fifleche
02-02-2006, 06:19 PM
Hey Bob, any chance all the scenario's could be put on one page, instead of having to browse through a gazillion lines in the "articles" archives?

:D

Thanks!

Stojakovic
02-02-2006, 07:04 PM
Hey Bob, any chance all the scenario's could be put on one page, instead of having to browse through a gazillion lines in the "articles" archives?

:D

Thanks!

I second that....

NEVjr
02-02-2006, 08:13 PM
i third that

jeff1981
02-02-2006, 08:24 PM
i agree with that idea