![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sinking the Bismark, where else?
Posts: 457
|
I have been reading the convoy scenario and need to ask- Are they kidding? The escorts ned to defend abseloutly crappy ships and have no idea what's comming. How can the escorts win? Is there something I'm missing?
__________________
SINK THE BISMARK!!!!!!!! BEST FORUM ON THE WEB FOR AXIS AND ALLIES MINIS! JOIN TODAY! http://aaminis.myfastforum.org/index.php |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I Rule The Sea
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 138
|
Boggles my mind too.
__________________
W-L-T = 7-0-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 308
|
I played it a couple of times right after the game came out and I got some subs. After they completely slaughtered the destroyers three times in a row I gave it up. Maybe with new harrassed subs rule they stand a chance, but it still seems like they should get a points bonus at least.
__________________
"He who draws his sword against his prince should throw away the scabbard." -The Duke of Parma |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sinking the Bismark, where else?
Posts: 457
|
Yeah, I mean check out the difference between these 3 builds.
2 Graf Spee-42 1 Scharnhorst-38 1 U510-11 1 Karl Galster-8 99 points and has tremendous surface power. All you need to do is hit the merchant ships once. 1 Shokaku- 20 5 Val-50 2 I 19-26 1 Subchaser-4 This has great air power and could kill merchants with ease 5 Kondors-30 5 U 510-55 2 Stukas This has the cheap shot Kondor galore, and a massive sub force. Stukas are something else to bomb them with. Each one of these builds could trounce a convoy and each require a vastly different build to defeat. I seems to me the escorts are playing a guessing game.
__________________
SINK THE BISMARK!!!!!!!! BEST FORUM ON THE WEB FOR AXIS AND ALLIES MINIS! JOIN TODAY! http://aaminis.myfastforum.org/index.php |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I Rule The Sea
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 138
|
Only way I can think to make it more evened out is a huge point bonus to the convoy boys, make the ships stronger, points reduction to attacker, or make it so more convoy ships are needed. (6 O'Briens instead of 3, and you gotta kill 5?)
Or some combination of the above. After reading this scenario the first time I had no real interest in it. Seemed like a total wash.
__________________
W-L-T = 7-0-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 208
|
This matches my experience the one time I played it -
I mixed up DDs, CLs, CAs and subs to get some capabilities for anti-sub, anti-surface and anti-air. Enemy just took subs and aircraft. Totally picked me apart, first their planes swamped my DDs to cripple my ASW capabilities, then their subs closed in started sinking cargo ships. My CAs spent the whole game waiting for the surface raider that never showed up. To add insult to injury the killed the last 2 (of 5) cargo ships with Kondor missiles, no defense for that. I'd be interested if any experienced players have found the scenario interesting or figured out ways to make it so? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Septcentennial Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 848
|
We just made up our own convoy version at the FLGS, way more in depth and historical.
__________________
Unhappy with the new Gleemax forums???? Check out this new forum for Axis and Allies Land and Sea miniatures!!! http://aaminis.myfastforum.org/index.php It has everything we like about these forums, only Wotc can't mess everything up because it's not theirs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Japanese Admiral
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 97
|
What rules do you use for that version?
__________________
Crewman: "Why are we waiting to attack the Japanese sir." Admiral: "We are waiting for him to bring up his reserves" Crewman: "But are not our two fleets equal?" Admiral: "Yes they are. However, this admiral is new, and he did not know when he sailed that his Long Lance torpeadoes are overpriced and he should have brought an addtional 10% of his current point values." Crewman: "I don't understand." Admiral: "No one does crewman, no one does." Trade List: Greyh's WAS Trade List +6 On Trade Boards |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Just Another Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 368
|
The harassment rules almost guarantee that subs will only have 1-2 torpedoes... even at range 0 and with wolf-pack bonuses. Destroyers own subs if they can close in in a group. Gotta use harassment though.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 123
|
The problem is that if you go with a destroyer heavy fleet, you will be destroyed by Kondors, cruisers, Zekes with the Tone, etc. You odds of guessing the exact fleet the raiders field is pretty low.
The only real way to do the scenario effectively is to have a list of balanced fleets for each side to choose from.
__________________
Last edited by RedSpike : 09-24-2007 at 09:04 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|